It’s going to be hard to change once those precedents are set.” These are important questions to address, Allen said, because once institutions “shift to digital, whatever model we put in place … we’re going to be stuck with for a while. More than 950 college campuses have adopted related programs since 2015, when a Department of Education regulation enabled institutions to include books and supplies in their tuition or fees.īut advocates of open educational resources like Nicole Allen, Sparc’s director of open education, worry that colleges - clamoring for low-cost textbook options - are buying into the model without knowing for sure whether it’s actually saving their students money, considering the breadth of used-book and rental options available. Inclusive access programs weave the cost of digital course materials into a student’s tuition and fees, and are marketed as a heavily discounted alternative to traditional print textbooks. So the Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition and its partners have launched a website they hope will encourage a healthy skepticism, and deeper research, into the increasingly popular model. “Inclusive access,” a textbook-sales model touted as a way to ensure that students without deep pockets can afford books, doesn’t always deliver on that promise, according to a leading open-access advocacy organization.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |